Wednesday, October 20, 2010

On Chicago - Updated, Revised

Writing about a marathon always takes me a long time and I am not sure why. I know that after every marathon I return to my job at a newspaper and seem to be in a position where I have more copy to create than I usually do and less time to create it.

Starting three or four days before a marathon I will have a very hard time bridging the two worlds I inhabit - one in which I try to cover certain distances in certain periods of time and a second in which I try to write a certain amount of words about a certain topic. In other words, I get distracted; I get far behind my normal creating-copy pace. Thus, when I return to work during what is my equivalent of a couple days behind schedule, my body beaten to hell, there is a lot of catching up to do and this catching up usually takes a lot of time.

All the while, as I spend my week off after a marathon drinking and eating like a total idiot, I actually spend scattered minutes here and there pondering sentences I might write for this entry - sentences that never seem to make it to print, for they exist in my imagination only for a very short period of time before they vanish altogether and I return to some form of the aforementioned and wonder, yet again: What the hell should I write?

For me, running and writing are impossible pursuits that never get any easier for reasons that are just as ineffable as they are totally and obviously opposite.

This much I know.

I also know that it is very easy for me to keep races, as the line goes, "in perspective." For that, I have West Africa to thank.

In Niger, I learned that the ability to be a runner is nothing less than a rare privilege. Being a runner means you have enough to eat. It means you have a job that pays you and is not overly taxing. It means you have room in your life for frivolous activities. I know that the men in eastern Niger that would join me for runs during the rare months when there was enough food and not too much work, with any time committed to training, could have been great runners. All it would take was some support and even less time.

These men had been through so much more.

This is just one reason that athletic training is neither a burden or hard or heroic. It only is what it is -- individualistic, a luxury, and a choice. Which is to say that when the occasion comes when I am not able to convert the training I do into the result I spent many months aiming for, I am able to say something like, "That's the journey. That's the way it goes."

But I will also admit that I ponder a lot. That it takes some to get over it. That I spend some time wishing that I could tell my father, my coaches, my family and my friends that it went as well as they I and hoped it would. Quite honestly, the whole thing - silly as it is - does in fact hurt.

---



Four days before the Chicago Marathon, I ran 30 minutes in pain. That afternoon, I ran some more - in pain.

That night, I called Dave Fontaine, who I usually train with on Thursday morning, and my longtime coach, Todd Lippin, to fill them in: If I don't get a breakthrough in less than 12 hours, I'm out.

Three days before the race, I could not believe it: I ran for 57 minutes more or less pain free. The pain in my hamstring started out as a dull ache and loosened up with time - a good sign.

I was going.

Mind you, I did feel sluggish during these 8 miles. My legs had no pop. But I attributed it to the fact that, during the string of missed days due to a sciatica flare up 10 days before the race, I had not been eating much to make sure I stayed at racing weight. Also, I was taking Aleve, pills that allow me to run but, as I have learned, in time, zap my strength.

In Chicago, Friday and Saturday, my shakeout runs were pretty similar to Thursday's session. Slight tightness. Legs a bit heavy. On Saturday, however, Sarah Buckheit stretched me out and said everything was looking dramatically better. I was calm, confident and, like everyone else, optimistically interpreting the weather report for highs in the lower 80s: It was not supposed to hit the high until the early afternoon.

I do not remember how my leg felt during the first couple miles of the race. I remember that, around mile 5, a gel slid out of place in my shorts, I grabbed it and took it right before a waterstop. I was running with a 2:26 pack that included half a dozen men and some elite women, including Desiree Davila (4th, 2:26.20), Irina Mikitenko (5th 2:26.40) and Magdalena Lewy-Boulet (7th, 2:28.44).

Heading around a sharp turn, I felt a sharp pinch in my hamstring that stayed with me for about 50 meters but then, I think, went away. You see, I was not allowing for negative thoughts - and I honestly do not believe I was feeling any. I remember, in our pack, there was a conversation between two guys who knew each other: One asked the other how he was feeling; the response was, "Like I'm running a marathon." I suppose that was how I felt, too.

I was not taking splits: I was just running the race I knew I was prepared to run.

Miles seven to 11 were good ones. I like this part of the course, as you start returning south. Our pack had jelled, the crowds were feeding us and there were periods of effortless running. We passed 10 miles in 55:30-ish, but as we passed 11 something was starting to change. The hamstring tightened for a time and then it was kind of like the knot released. My legs were instantly dead.

I stuck with the pack. I took fluids at every opportunity. The crowds were roaring, but I was starting to lose contact.

No. No. No.

Lewy-Boulet was clearly having a rough day. She was to my right. She surged. So, so tough. There was a sharp right turn heading to 13.1. There's the pinch again. Screw it. Come on, man! Your system is strong. ... You can run uncomfortably for a long, long time. ... It's not that big a deal.

So you feel like crap. Just accept it. Just GO!

1:13.07 ... about a minute slower than where I was in 2006. But this was the plan ...

By 14, I had been dropped - my legs were dead, my gait was off (my dad, actually, says it was off at 1.5 miles).

Time to fight. Give it everything.

The rough patch, though, was not clearing up. My legs were feeling worse - starting to actually hurt, quiver. Around 16, I caught up to Craig Segal, a really good runner and an even better guy. He was EASILY in 2:23 or better shape. There were no words; neither he nor I could utter even one. This was my first indication that a lot more runners than me were not going to realize what they had dreamed about in training.

By 19, I knew that finishing was not in my best interest. There was the potential to do some real damage.

I waited until I saw my dad, around 21.5, and walked off the course. He put his arm around me. I stood there for a second, kind of shocked; I never, ever, thought I would have to drop out of a marathon.

He flagged down a cab.

I took off my sunglasses.

Then - for the first time - I realized just how hot it was.

---

In Chicago, many runners had very bad days.

Some runners had very good days.

Some runners had decent days.

Those of us who fall in the very bad or decent (or less than decent) can only wonder: What went wrong?

You see these Kenyan super-runners like Simon Wanjiru redefining the sport. He likes the heat. Nothing, be it injury or lack of fitness, seems to stop them.

You see that members of the Hansons team ran personal bests, and then read a quote from their coach expressing his opinion that it was not really that hot - adjust, be tougher.

I support anything that pushes American distance running to new heights, but I also think part of the reason most pros will have a better time dealing with tough conditions than working types will is because (one) they are that much more prepared for the race (2) they get bottles (3) they are pros.

Still, if you were to look up the results of the runners in the photograph, you would find that most of them held up well in the second half of the race - and I like to think that if I was physically 100% I might have done the same. But, again, you can only wonder. I just hope I am tough enough.

Patrick Reaves (2:36.33, 131st) describes the atmosphere late in the race as such: "While the first half of the course in Chicago's north side is pleasant and shaded, the second half is brutally exposed to the sun, and it was getting hot, especially as we passed US Cellular Field. I started passing guys doing the death shuffle or just walking outright, presumably with the heat as a catalyst. Looking at the results after the race, a grand total of one guy ahead of me negative split the first and second half. That's brutal."

It sure is.

The mind, though, is capable of forgetting all of this, or at least capable of disconnecting from the memory. In the next couple weeks, while running, mine, I know, will do what it does - turn over. It will be my body, in fact, that needs more time to recover.

"That's why even though I had a rough day yesterday," writes Ben Ingram (2:50.46, 385th), who logged huge miles in hopes of cracking 2:30, "I know I'll eventually be back for more. Eventually I'll look at a calendar and plan six months of training. But for now I drink a few strong ales and rest.

"For now, it's over."

DEVELOPING...

Sunday, October 10, 2010

# 8 - DNF

I dropped out of the Chicago Marathon today at 21.5 miles. Unfortunately, I was not 100 percent today -- and the heat was the nail in the coffin. Things started heading south around 20K (went through the half in a few ticks over 1:13).

I will write more ... but probably not until Wednesday.

For now, I just want to thank my family, friends and teammates for all of their support. I am truly blessed.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

The Decision

Last night, I went to the track, stretched out my hip flexor, ran a mile easy, ran a mile a little faster:5:50. The tightness/pain in my hamstring was about the same as it was in the morning. Afterward, I met with Sarah and she stretched me out. I knew where this was going ...

This morning: the test, the run we make a decision after. I ran 57 minutes, at least 8 miles, with basically no problems. Afterward, I made phone calls, I talked to my wife ... the feedback was all pointing me in the same direction.

I have the advantage of being able to see Sarah, who will be in Chicago, on Friday and Saturday.

I'm going.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

An Unfortunate Development - Developing

At this point, I can say that the situation is better than it was on Monday, when I was not able to run a step. As Joe McVeigh, part of my brain trust, put it: "a one-step relapse is, uh, not good."

Exactly.

Yesterday, I did not try to run in the morning and, after work, went to see Sarah Buckheit again. She was more aggressive this time in stretching out my hip flexor and working a lot with my feet, where we are beginning to believe the root of this bio-mechanical mishap can be located.

She stretched me out, I jogged around the parking lot ... we repeated this perhaps four or five times. So, I was able to run, but I could certainly feel tension in my hamstring.

This morning, I was able to run for 30 minutes. Here is how I described it to SB.

I was able to get through 30 minutes and I suppose I could have kept going, meaning I don't think the pain was increasing; it had stabilized. I did feel discomfort in my hamstring every step of the way. The first 10 minutes were the worst, and then, like I said, it kind of tapered off a bit. I ran on relatively flat terrain and slight changes -- uphill, downill -- did not have any effect. Generally, the quicker I ran the better, and there may have been small segments of time where I was able to transcend the discomfort slightly by being mentally elsewhere. At the same time, I can't get sloppy with my footstrikes because it seemed like when that happened I'd feel the nerve get pinched. Turns, as well, were not particularly pleasant. I'm icing now. What do you think?

So ... the next step. I will stretch throughout the day and, if I am feeling OK, I will go to BCC tonight for the scheduled dress rehearsal. My workout, however, will not be the same as it will be for my teammates.

I will stretch, run a couple laps easy and attempt about a mile at MP pace. After that, I'll see SB again. After that, I don't know ...

Monday, October 4, 2010

An Unfortunate Development

My taper was progressing without incident -- I was feeling good -- until Wednesday evening, after my standard 10-days-out workout of 3 by 1 mile at about 5K effort. The good news: I did the workout faster and more comfortably than I ever have: 4:58, 56, 55. The bad news: Afterward I felt some tightness in my right hamstring.

I assumed this was just one in a medley of the usual minor aches and pains. The next day, running easy, it was pretty tight when I started out, then it eased up, then it got really tight (at around 45 minutes). I walked it in, got on ice, ibuprofen, took the next day (Friday) off.

On Saturday, though, I was surprised, when running, to find that the tightness had basically left my right leg and had migrated to the left. 20 minutes was all I could get through; spent the rest of the day focusing on that leg. Sunday, same thing. That afternoon I went with Jake Klim to see Sarah Buckheit, a PT who has helped him work through his stress fracture. She stretched me out some and was pretty sure this was a tightness/sciatica related issue, not a hamstring issue.

Basically, she did a couple release things (this is not something I am able to describe in detail, at this point) and felt that might be all I need. Today's test, however, did not go well. I made it but a step before the hamstring tightened into a knot. I am going to see her again tomorrow. At this point, we need a breakthrough.

To be clear, the missed time is of zero concern to me. What concerns me is the need to get my body in order. If it is not, I won't run -- it's that simple.

Suggestions are of course welcome.